Messing With The Profane and The Sacred
Our political opposition clearly understands the need to capture culture to win politically. That became most evident to me in the last two days with two very similar, but highly contrasting stories. Each involves something very near and dear to me, on the one hand we have comic books, something quite profane, and on the other the most sacred of things, my faith.
Let’s start with the profane, comic books, as from the Washington Times we learn:
A writer for DC Comics‘ Superman series has come under attack by homosexual rights activists, who view his work as anti-gay and want him fired.
Orson Scott Card is one of a team of writers and artists to create the new digital DC Comics product, “Adventures of Superman,” according to a report from Fox News. Mr. Card is a Mormon and vocal opponent of gay marriage. Fox News reported he once referred to same-sex marriage as the end of democracy in American and suggested “the left is at war with the family.”
[...]
Their petition, at Allout.org, states: “[Mr. Card‘s] written publicly that he believes marriage equality would lead to the end of civilization. We need to let DC Comic know they can’t support Orson Scott Card or his work to keep LGBT people as second-class citizens. They know they’re accountable to their fans, so if enough of us speak out now, they’ll hear us loud and clear.”
WOW! Who knew Superman was that important. More amazing still is that I am one of the largest consumers of comic books you will ever know, Seriously, you have no idea, And if anything, comics are increasingly falling in line with the “gay agenda.” There is nothing to protest here, honestly – even were I a proponent same-sex marriage.
But most interestingly is the designation of unmarried.members of the LGBT community as “second class.” My wife and I did not meet and get married until around 40 years of age, and subsequently we are childless. Certainly not the norm. Are we “second class?” I think we are given the way they are tossing around that term. Should we protest and boycott?
But I do not want to argue the inanities of this particular battle in greater war, Let’s keep moving – on to the sacred. From the College Fix we learn:
A recent guest lecture at Swarthmore College by a prominent homosexual seminary professor highlighted a growing argument among the so-called queer community that Jesus was bisexual.
In particular, the Rev. Patrick Cheng, a professor at the Episcopal Divinity School in Massachusetts, told the students that Jesus was a subversive person and God’s way of “queering the world,” so to speak.Cheng said Christ was “always coming out in the gospels” and that “Christ is God coming out.”
“At its heart, Christianity is queer,” Cheng told the students during the Feb. 7 talk. “It’s not just a matter of being tolerant. Christianity is queer at its core.”
Cheng, author of the 2011 book “Radical Love: An Introduction to Queer Theology,” as well as “From Sin to Amazing Grace: Discovering the Queer Christ,” published last year, argues queer theology essentially takes its cues from Jesus, who Cheng described in his speech as the ultimate boundary crosser.
“Queerness is at its heart radical love,” he said.
Cheng, who holds degrees from Harvard, Yale and Union Theological Seminary, and also blogs about religion and homosexuality on Huffington Post, emphasized during his speech that feminist and queer theorists such as himself build theology from their own experience.
I shake when I read that. To get drawn again, briefly, into the specific argument, how can one “build theology from one’s own experience?” Theology is, by definition, the study of the theos, the divine, you know GOD. In that phrase “Rev.” Cheng has decided we are God. That is to say if our experience is how we build our understanding of God then we are God, So where is the difference between this definition of theology and sociology or psychology?
But again, I do not want to argue this.
What is most evident here is the aggressive, even hyper aggressive, attempt to paste their agenda onto every literally every aspect of life. In light of such an assault, how do we respond?
We have assumed to now that simply living our lives would adequately communicate the counter message. Married, religiously active families are by far the most prosperous and content in the nation. That should speak for itself. But in an age when the media can so pervasively skew perception, when the Avengers can come to life quite convincingly on the big screen, we cannot rely on people to merely digest the evidence in front of them. In an age when government assistance in all its many and varied forms renders irrelevant the economic reasoning behind the nuclear family, we must do more.
It is also not enough to just play defense. We always look weak when defending.
The time has come for us to be as hyper-aggressive as they. The attack on Card at DC is vile. They would deny him his employment on that basis of his stance. That is certainly a violation of Orson Scott Card’s civil liberties. “Rev.” Cheng’s pronouncements are blasphemous. Please recall that blasphemy is the crime of making ourselves God. It is what Christ was crucified for. The only difference is Christ WAS God. I am more than reasonably confident that “Rev.” Cheng is not.
We can no longer sit quietly and let this stuff roll off our backs as the few making noise. These are attacks. These two stories are nuisance actions, they are not the main thrust of the war. But they need response. We have been losing the war to date by focusing a bit too much on the main battle axis and ignoring the thousands of little nuisance actions that impede our supply lines, dangerously erode our morale, and generally thin our ranks.
Note that the LGBT community will not be content with merely carving out a place for themselves in our greater society. They intend to transform that society in every aspect, from the most profane to the most sacred to conform to their agenda. They intend to eliminate our place in our greater society. Forget religion and homosexuality – that is simply unAmerican.
Posted in Culture Wars | 4 Comments » |
Print this post
|
Email This Post

Retrocon on 13 Feb 2013 at 9:36 am #
John’s comment about Patrick Cheng deciding WE are God brings to mind something very similar I remember from several years back.
In 2004, when New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey resigned following a very public scandal, he used the opportunity to ‘come out’ as homosexual:
“At a point in every person’s life, one has to look deeply into the mirror of one’s soul and decide one’s unique truth in the world, not as we may want to see it or hope to see it, but as it is.
And so my truth is that I am a gay American.”
It struck me, at the time, that as much as he described his deep soul searching to discover truth “as it is”, in the end it was just he, himself, who decided what truth was. As with Cheng, it seems McGreevey is proclaiming that MAN is the ultimate decider of truth, rather than GOD.
The contrast is evident among the humbly faithful, who, when searching into the deep recesses of the soul, are looking for God to REVEAL TRUTH to them.
CarlH on 13 Feb 2013 at 10:56 am #
I found it interesting, and not a little bit disconcerting, that even the Washington Times decided that the fact that Orson Scott Card is a Mormon was more headline-worthy in this context than the fact that he is a well-known, award-winning author. Indeed the article itself, while also mentioning Card’s Mormonism, fails to say anything about his writing credentials. At least The Guardian [UK]‘s article on the same topic, which also mentions that Card is a Mormon (and which was published earlier, as well), managed to mention that Card is the “author of the award-winning and best-selling Ender’s Game sci-fi series” (even while the URL for the article refers to Card as a “homophobic writer”–wonder if that may have been the working headline that may have been too much even for an editor at The Guardian).
When the agenda is more important than the credentials (let alone, more important than objective truth), we are in a very serious “mess” indeed.
Rockgod28 on 13 Feb 2013 at 11:25 am #
Time toto go onto Offense.
How do we win the culture war when we have already lost?
These activists never think about or consider the logical conclusion of their position. Let us start with the same gender activists. Ok the writer is removed. DC gets an activist approved writer. Comic sales drop as the writing suffers which turns away consumers. If DC is luck they will dump the approved writer and get back the previous teams that got sales. Simple economics. DC tested the waters with announcing a major DC charater coming out. To their horror from an economic stand point it would be a disaster to make any of their regular characters same gender attracted. So they announced a character that everyone thought was that persuasion anyway. No news, but economically a successful test of what to do.
According to “Rev.” Chang and activists like him argue that passions, appetites and desires should be explored, not reigned in or controlled. That exploration in defiance of the very commandmemts and teachings of Christ already has a name. It is called sin.
We can not win the culture war. We aren’t even supposed to try. Here is what I mean. Luke 12:13-15. Immediately after Jesus told a parable of the danger of putting your heart on possessions and the things of this world. “Rev.” Chang isn’t seeking after the kingdom of God. He is attempting to steal the vineyard by declaring it his own.
As long as we are humble followers of Christ we can weather the storms, the disasters and adversity to come as we live in these latter days before the Savior returns. We need to do as Jesus said and store for ourselves treasures in heaven. The wealth of our nation does not protect us or save us. We can raise our voices in warning and hope we are listened to. Let God’s judgements come as we strive to be better followers of Christ and prepare the kingdom of God for his return.
Are We Losing Or Quitting? | Article VI Blog | John Schroeder on 18 Feb 2013 at 7:15 am #
[...] CommentsRockgod28 on Messing With The Profane and The SacredCarlH on Messing With The Profane and The SacredRetrocon on Messing With The Profane and The [...]