Article VI Blog

"Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by a Mormon, an Evangelical, and an Orthodox Christian"

United States Constitution — Article VI:

"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly?

Posted by: John Schroeder at 06:00 am, August 18th 2010     —    5 Comments »

As much as Huckabee’s back-handed play of the Mormon card in ’08 was despicable, it seems like it is always the left that just gets in-your-face nasty on issues like race and religion.  As the Ground Zero Mosque controversy heats up, I guess it was inevitable – and Harry Reid sealed the deal when he came out against it – The Mormon persecution/Muslim persecution comparisons were going to be drawn.  Of course, there is virtually no such comparison, but since when did that stop the rabid left from taking the shot anyway?

Some of what is going on is so transparent as to not be worth arguing with, like this bit from a Salt Lake City “alternative” (read “gay”) paper.  But it is Jonathon Chait at The New Republic that seems to be really turning up the heat.  His post on Jennifer Rubin’s comments have a barely disguised anti-Semitic tone.  That set loose a torrent of comments that truly are heinous.  Here is the worst:

I wonder if Romney or Harry Reid would also oppose the building of a Mormon church or Temple near Mountain Meadows.

As an initial point, the first place I heard the Ground Zero/Mountain Meadows comparison was on the Michael Medved radio show, and I winced at the time – I knew then, and this proves, that all such comments can only serve to provide ammunition to the opposition.  But that said, there simply is no comparison.  No Mormon has ever proposed building a ward or stake house, or a Temple anywhere near the site of that unfortunate incident.  In point of fact Mormons are quite horrified by the entire episode and when it comes up they tend to either deny the participants are “real” Mormons or shrink from the conversation in complete embarrassment.  The Mountain Meadows Massacre is a point of deep shame  for any Mormon I have ever met or read – it is not an “opportunity for outreach.”

In this instance the comparison serves only to politicize on new levels something that should not be a political argument to begin with.  Ground Zero is about the sense of a national sacred space that most of us share when we visit the places where our fellow citizens lost their lives.  Comparisons have been drawn to Civil War battlegrounds and I find them a far more apt comparison.  Every time I have been to such a battleground I have found myself speaking in unintentional whispers.

As an Evangelical, by definition, I want to tell others of the amazing experience I have had in my walk with Jesus Christ, and yet to do so when wandering the emplacements of Gettysburg or Vicksburg would be beyond distasteful.  Those places honor those that died in service to others, or as victims of war.  To graft a different agenda onto those spaces, whether it is s religious or a political one,  is to lessen that honor due.  I do not think God expects me to lessen that honor, and my political convictions just are not that important.

Shame on anyone that uses this issue for their private agendas.

Lowell adds . . .

I’ll just drop in for a moment to add to John’s Mountain Meadows analogy, which I’ve actually been using in discussions with friends about the Ground Zero mosque. John’s right: That place, Mountain Meadows, is not one that Mormons are proud of. It is a site on which people closely associated with Mormonism (to say the least) committed horrible acts of murder on other human beings. It is umimaginable that the Church would build a temple, for example, on the edge of that site.  The Church may have the legal right to do so, but as my father used to say,  just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.  I am opposed to legal steps being taken to stop the mosque’s construction, but I support efforts to persuade or incentivize the group planning to build the mosque to put it up somewhere else.  I think I have an awful lot of company in my view.

Share

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments » | Print this post Print this post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recently Posted:

5 Responses to “How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly?”

  1. Tweets that mention How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly? | Article VI Blog | John Schroeder -- Topsy.com on 18 Aug 2010 at 10:18 am #

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mitt Romney in 2012!, Patrick Robinson and Article VI Blog, Article VI Blog. Article VI Blog said: #hhrs New @ Article VI Blog:: How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly? http://bit.ly/dfvv4L [...]

  2. dwynn on 19 Aug 2010 at 3:49 pm #

    Both of your references to the Mountain Meadow Massacre is very awkward as I don’t believe you are up on current events. The LDS church did build a monument at the Mountain Meadow Massacre sight to those who lost their lives. The LDS church invited the families whose ancestors were killed. If you would have had this historical information, I’m not sure if you would have made the same analagy as the LDS church has already gone out of its way to heal the bitter emotions that center on this tragedy. This is clearly not being done at the ground zero site by those islamic leaders. Frankly, I am disappointed in the articles obtuseness to the LDS Church’s effort. Further, the history on the MMM shows that members of the church were involved but the church was clearly not as the correspondence to the Mormon settlers from the church was to leave the people alone. But many of the settlers were terrified due to their past experience with mobs in Missouri which created a terrible moment in history.

    Going forward, when referencing events, please be up to date on your history. Thanks,

  3. Lowell Brown on 20 Aug 2010 at 8:59 am #

    dwynn: Thanks for your comment. I’m afraid my brief addition to this post may have given you the wrong impression. As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints I’m fully aware of, and happy about, everything the Church has done recently about Mountain Meadows. My point is that Mountain Meadows is not a place where the Church would ever build a temple. Like building the Ground Zero mosque, that action would be insensitive and send the wrong message. It’s similar to the Carmelite convent that was built at Auschwitz, then moved by Pope John Paul II because that was just not the place for it – regardless of the pure motives of the nuns residing in the convent.

    Yes, there is a monument on the Mountain Meadows site to honor the dead, but that is a very different thing from the proposed mosque at Ground Zero.

    Lowell

  4. dwynn on 20 Aug 2010 at 8:45 pm #

    Thank you for the clarification and appreciate your thoughts.

  5. Mitt, Mosques, Mormons, Obama’s Religion, Also-Ran’s and More… | Article VI Blog | John Schroeder on 23 Aug 2010 at 6:28 am #

    [...] Comments dwynn on How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly?Lowell Brown on How Come It Is Always The Lefties That Just Get Nasty Ugly?dwynn on How Come It Is [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« The Left Makes Trouble, Prop 8 Backwash, General Presidential Politics and Stuff We Find Interesting  |  SLATE – Lower Than… »