We noted Monday that as the mid-terms draw near, the discussion of 2012 is heating up. Seems like there is another thing driving discussion and it’s silly, just because it is meaningless at this juncture. PACs issued their financials on schedule this week and that set the world buzzing. This is a very leftie analysis of the releases, but it is the only one I could find that touched on most of the majors – ignore the commentary, follow the links and look at the numbers for yourself. I shouldn’t bother, but one shot is too rich not to take. Consider:
“They’re not interested in necessarily winning the House and Senate back for Republicans. That’s not their No.1 objective,” said Daniel Smith, a University of Florida professor who directs the political campaigning program there. “They’re selectively placing their bets, using their PAC dollars on Republican candidates who can elevate their national profile and also procure free media in key battleground states in the run-up before the 2012 Republican primary.”
Well, the incumbent Democrat gets more free media than the rest of the world put together AND when it comes to not helping congressional candidate in his own party, this guy’s a champ! Come on, this is politics as usual – why are we trying to cast it as a problem? Robert Costa on The Corner did look at Palin, Romney and Pawlenty.
Palin Got The Most Attention…
I still don’t think she is running, but her fund raising is impressive (even though Romney out-raised them all) – which caused a lot of people to conclude she was. Including this bit of analysis obviously designed not to be helpful but to make trouble:
Assuming that the race is then reduced to Palin and Romney, the next critical state primary is South Carolina. At that point, I don’t think the specifics really matter. The fact is that the Republican Party of 2012 is not going to nominate a Mormon as its standard bearer. And the more important fact is that the base of the Republican Party doesn’t just favor Sarah Palin, they love her. She is their standard bearer. And they will not — this time around — be denied.
Please note, the presumption is that Republicans are close-minded bigots. That bit got someone at Right-O-Sphere pretty worked up, causing them to ask, “Should Mormons Abandon the Republican Party?“ OK – initial response, “For What?” Yes, there are jerks in the party – but there are jerks everywhere, and in leaving the party all you do is let the jerks win. Not to mention there is no other party that comes even close to representing your point of view, dear Mormon friend.
But also note this, the jerks are not a majority. Romney keeps winning straw polls, and anecdotal polling shows Romney’s support is much broader than his faith. In other words, as we predicted Monday, lefties/Dems are terrified of an Obama/Romney race and they are going to punch the religion ticket as many times as they can to try and change the odds. Don’t take the bait – this time the jerks are behind the woodshed, and in the primary we can administer the spanking. Here is why the left fears Romney:
Former supporters of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign who do not approve of his job performance favor former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney over the rest of the GOP field, according to a new Public Policy Polling survey.
They fear Romney so much that one of their big guns (Mark Halperin) decided to stir the pot:
One adviser to Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, and, by traditional standards, the putative 2012 frontrunner, says of Palin, “She’s not a serious human being.” Another Romney intimate warns, “If she’s standing up there in a debate and the answers are more than 15 seconds long, she’s in trouble.”
So, we have two entirely unattributed quotations of “advisers.” You know, if Romney reads this blog, and I think he has from time-to-time, I guess I am an adviser too. And since I have met him I guess I am an “intimate” as well, so does what I say on this blog define the stance of the Romney camp? Not hardly!
There is also the issue of context. I am far from alone in thinking Palin is not running. It is really only in the fevered imaginations of the MSM that there is serious hope she will run. It is quite possible that these sound bites came in the broader context of discussing the unlikelihood of her running and in that context are not nearly as pernicious as they sound quoted here. As we, and many others, have said all along - Palin is a marvelous voice for an important wing of our movement, but that does not necessarily translate to a presidential candidacy.
What we have here is is a case of Halperin trying to create a rift inside the Republican coalition – especially between the Tea Party and the rest of the party. We don’t know who these people are, how close they really are to Romney, or anything else other than they conveniently said something that would create problems, conveniently in the hearing of Mark Halperin. I’m not putting much stock in this. Why Allahpundit thinks its worth this much analysis is beyond me.
UPDATE AFTER POSTING: Seems Romney Agrees with this analysis. Today he tweeted:
“TIME says unnamed advisors disparaged @SarahPalinUSA. Anonymous numbskulls. She’s proven her smarts; they’ve disproven theirs.”
BACK TO THE ORIGINAL POST:
The left is also very worked up about the WaPo Op-Ed that Romney wrote, which we noted a couple of weeks ago, on the proposed new START Treaty. Look, foreign policy is not our thing here, so I will not even attempt to round up this discussion, but it has been broad and it has been vitriolic. I will; however, link to this particular argument against the treaty – when I saw the publishers I laughed out loud. ‘Nuff Said.
In Other News…
Gingrich is seriously thinking about running? Read: Gingrich’s “q” needs a jolt. That does not mean he will not run, just means that if he does, it will be for reasons other than to win the nomination. By the way, I am all for Christian forgiveness, but there is a streak of anger out there, still, at Gingrich’s personal behavior that runs pretty deep. He needs to tread very carefully.
I’ve heard a lot of legislative prayers from religious leaders of many stripes. If one goes, they all gotta go since they all invoke their deity. I’ve heard Vishnu and Allah just to mention a couple.
Moderation disguising a pro-Obama rant. The court is allowed to change its mind, you know.