<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Invisible Primary Is Getting Less Invisible, Some Philosophy and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.article6blog.com/2009/11/16/the-invisible-primary-is-getting-less-invisible-some-philosophy-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/11/16/the-invisible-primary-is-getting-less-invisible-some-philosophy-and-more/</link>
	<description>&#34;Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by a Mormon, an Evangelical, and an Orthodox Christian&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coltakashi</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/11/16/the-invisible-primary-is-getting-less-invisible-some-philosophy-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13453</link>
		<dc:creator>coltakashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/?p=1601#comment-13453</guid>
		<description>So Mitt Romney is not qualified to comment on President Obama&#039;s dilatory decision making about Afghanistan because Romney hasn&#039;t been president?  Does that mean that Senator Obama, who also lacked any military service experience, was unqualified to express an opinion about the decisions President Bush made (or did not make) concerning Iraq and Afghanistan?  

Frankly, the lack of tolerance in the Obama Administration for any criticism is one of its consistent themes.  I guess the &quot;transparency&quot; that Candidate Obama spoke about is a &quot;two-way mirror&quot; (a real misnomer--it should be a &quot;one-way glass&quot;), where they get to watch us, be we don&#039;t get to watch them.  As they gather more and more power to themselves, they will have increasing ability to use that power to silence their critics.  They are already regulating the auto industry and the banking and mortgage industry, and are seeking to regulate local public transit, all health care, and all energy production.  

The combination of increased centralization of power and intolerance for free speech is the same thing that Democrats constantly recite as the essential crime of the Nixon Administration.  Yet there is every indication that the Obama Administration is seeking a level of imperial power that Richard Nixon could only dream of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Mitt Romney is not qualified to comment on President Obama&#8217;s dilatory decision making about Afghanistan because Romney hasn&#8217;t been president?  Does that mean that Senator Obama, who also lacked any military service experience, was unqualified to express an opinion about the decisions President Bush made (or did not make) concerning Iraq and Afghanistan?  </p>
<p>Frankly, the lack of tolerance in the Obama Administration for any criticism is one of its consistent themes.  I guess the &#8220;transparency&#8221; that Candidate Obama spoke about is a &#8220;two-way mirror&#8221; (a real misnomer&#8211;it should be a &#8220;one-way glass&#8221;), where they get to watch us, be we don&#8217;t get to watch them.  As they gather more and more power to themselves, they will have increasing ability to use that power to silence their critics.  They are already regulating the auto industry and the banking and mortgage industry, and are seeking to regulate local public transit, all health care, and all energy production.  </p>
<p>The combination of increased centralization of power and intolerance for free speech is the same thing that Democrats constantly recite as the essential crime of the Nixon Administration.  Yet there is every indication that the Obama Administration is seeking a level of imperial power that Richard Nixon could only dream of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Invisible Primary Is Getting Less Invisible, Some Philosophy and more &#124; Article VI Blog &#124; John Schroeder -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/11/16/the-invisible-primary-is-getting-less-invisible-some-philosophy-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13452</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Invisible Primary Is Getting Less Invisible, Some Philosophy and more &#124; Article VI Blog &#124; John Schroeder -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/?p=1601#comment-13452</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mitt Romney in 2012!, comMITTed to Romney. comMITTed to Romney said: The Invisible Primary is Getting Less Invisible, Some Philosophy and More: http://tinyurl.com/yjfyhad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mitt Romney in 2012!, comMITTed to Romney. comMITTed to Romney said: The Invisible Primary is Getting Less Invisible, Some Philosophy and More: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yjfyhad" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yjfyhad</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

