<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Running For What &#8211; Evangelical News &#8211; and more&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.article6blog.com/2009/10/22/whos-running-for-what-evangelical-news-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/10/22/whos-running-for-what-evangelical-news-and-more/</link>
	<description>&#34;Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by an Evangelical Christian and A Mormon&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:04:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Article VI Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iowa, Issues, Identity; Problems in the GOP, and . . . &#8220;The Mormon Ethic of Civility&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/10/22/whos-running-for-what-evangelical-news-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13382</link>
		<dc:creator>Article VI Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Iowa, Issues, Identity; Problems in the GOP, and . . . &#8220;The Mormon Ethic of Civility&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/?p=1500#comment-13382</guid>
		<description>[...] VI Blog » Blog Archive » Romney Defends Israel -- Topsy.com on Romney Defends Israelcoltakashi on Who&#8217;s Running For What &#8211; Evangelical News &#8211; and more&#8230;coltakashi on Who&#8217;s Running For What &#8211; Evangelical News &#8211; and more&#8230;Article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VI Blog » Blog Archive » Romney Defends Israel &#8212; Topsy.com on Romney Defends Israelcoltakashi on Who&#8217;s Running For What &#8211; Evangelical News &#8211; and more&#8230;coltakashi on Who&#8217;s Running For What &#8211; Evangelical News &#8211; and more&#8230;Article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coltakashi</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/10/22/whos-running-for-what-evangelical-news-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13372</link>
		<dc:creator>coltakashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/?p=1500#comment-13372</guid>
		<description>The Slate article mentioned George Soros, 79, as a potential addition to the list next year. It also had a Doonesbury cartoon claiming that Obama deserved his Nobel Peace prize more than Henry Kissinger, blaming Kissinger as if he created the war in Vietnam rather than negotiated a treaty that closed it.  That juxtaposition germinated an idea, which is off the theme of Article VI, but I hope you will let me lay out this hypothesis, because it is relevant to presidential politics in 2012.  This is just my personal thought, and I have no specific evidence for any of it.  

What if the explanation for Obama&#039;s Nobel is that left wing billionaire George Soros (or someone like him) bought it for him? We know that the International Olympic Committee for decades was voting based on bribes from the competing venues.  A million dollars or so, a small amount for this hypothetical billionaire, could buy the votes of a majority of the Nobel committee (perhaps through non-cash gifts, scholarships for relatives, aid to a third party), and give candidate Obama a badge of approval to enhance his prestige and potential to win in 2012.  Not to mention it gives Obama over $1 million tax free in a way that is not barred by conflict of interest and bribery laws (You pay tax on lottery winnings, but not on Nobel prizes or other recognition of achievement like an Olympic gold medal).  In effect, it would be a way of money laundering a gift.  My hypothesis in no way requires that Obama have any involvement in this.

What if Al Gore&#039;s Nobel Peace prize was the pilot program?  I know that the liberal leanings of the prize committee could produce these results all on their own, but that would also mean they would be more susceptible to taking an inducement without thinking they were going against principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Slate article mentioned George Soros, 79, as a potential addition to the list next year. It also had a Doonesbury cartoon claiming that Obama deserved his Nobel Peace prize more than Henry Kissinger, blaming Kissinger as if he created the war in Vietnam rather than negotiated a treaty that closed it.  That juxtaposition germinated an idea, which is off the theme of Article VI, but I hope you will let me lay out this hypothesis, because it is relevant to presidential politics in 2012.  This is just my personal thought, and I have no specific evidence for any of it.  </p>
<p>What if the explanation for Obama&#8217;s Nobel is that left wing billionaire George Soros (or someone like him) bought it for him? We know that the International Olympic Committee for decades was voting based on bribes from the competing venues.  A million dollars or so, a small amount for this hypothetical billionaire, could buy the votes of a majority of the Nobel committee (perhaps through non-cash gifts, scholarships for relatives, aid to a third party), and give candidate Obama a badge of approval to enhance his prestige and potential to win in 2012.  Not to mention it gives Obama over $1 million tax free in a way that is not barred by conflict of interest and bribery laws (You pay tax on lottery winnings, but not on Nobel prizes or other recognition of achievement like an Olympic gold medal).  In effect, it would be a way of money laundering a gift.  My hypothesis in no way requires that Obama have any involvement in this.</p>
<p>What if Al Gore&#8217;s Nobel Peace prize was the pilot program?  I know that the liberal leanings of the prize committee could produce these results all on their own, but that would also mean they would be more susceptible to taking an inducement without thinking they were going against principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coltakashi</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2009/10/22/whos-running-for-what-evangelical-news-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-13371</link>
		<dc:creator>coltakashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/?p=1500#comment-13371</guid>
		<description>I looked at the Slate &quot;80 over 80&quot; list of &quot;powerful octogenarians&quot;.  Since President Monson is listed alongside people like Senator Inouye and Barbara Walters, it is more in the &quot;backhanded compliment&quot; category than a naked insult.  

I would have been surprised if Slate had recognized that his &quot;power&quot; derives from his decades of personal service, such as meeting with Mormons in communist controlled East Germany and persuading the government to allow the Church to build a temple where Mormons in eastern Europe could be married for eternity, or of his selection of Dieter Uchtdorf (a former VP of Lufthansa and a refugee from East Germany) as his Second Counselor in the First Presidency.  My son works in nursing homes in Salt Lake, and Monson is constantly visiting people there, maintaining friendships and care relationships he established as a 22-year-old bishop with hundreds of widows in his congregation.  Slate also omitted mention of the publication this year of a Mormon edition of the bible in Spanish, to serve millions of Mormons in Spain and Latin America, with cross references to the Book of Mormon and study aids heretofore available only with the King James Version.  And it might have mentioned that the temples announced by Monson include ones in Utah and Japan and Italy, reflecting the international growth of the LDS Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at the Slate &#8220;80 over 80&#8243; list of &#8220;powerful octogenarians&#8221;.  Since President Monson is listed alongside people like Senator Inouye and Barbara Walters, it is more in the &#8220;backhanded compliment&#8221; category than a naked insult.  </p>
<p>I would have been surprised if Slate had recognized that his &#8220;power&#8221; derives from his decades of personal service, such as meeting with Mormons in communist controlled East Germany and persuading the government to allow the Church to build a temple where Mormons in eastern Europe could be married for eternity, or of his selection of Dieter Uchtdorf (a former VP of Lufthansa and a refugee from East Germany) as his Second Counselor in the First Presidency.  My son works in nursing homes in Salt Lake, and Monson is constantly visiting people there, maintaining friendships and care relationships he established as a 22-year-old bishop with hundreds of widows in his congregation.  Slate also omitted mention of the publication this year of a Mormon edition of the bible in Spanish, to serve millions of Mormons in Spain and Latin America, with cross references to the Book of Mormon and study aids heretofore available only with the King James Version.  And it might have mentioned that the temples announced by Monson include ones in Utah and Japan and Italy, reflecting the international growth of the LDS Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
