Article VI Blog

"Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by an Evangelical Christian and A Mormon"

United States Constitution — Article VI:

"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

In The Wake Of Prop 8

Posted by: John Schroeder at 11:23 am, November 22nd 2008     —    2 Comments »

Certainly the people that started this blog, Lowell and I, and to some extent Hugh Hewitt, thought that Mitt Romney’s candidacy would be the great show down between Mormons and the nation.  I certainly thought it offered and opportunity for the once refugee community to finally heal all wounds with the nation.  As things have turned out Romney’s run was derailed by a petulant little fit by a group of Evangelicals just a little too enamored with wanting the role of “kingmaker,”  more likely to hurt Evangelical political influence than finally welcome Mormons completely into the national fold.

But that does not mean there has not been a national showdown on Mormonism this cycle just past – it just came in the form of California’s Proposition 8.  Consider all the letters that have discussed the matter in the NYTimes.  Here is one example, and consider especially the second letter in this bunch.

To the Editor:

The Mormons seem shocked by the angry reaction by the gay community to the huge support for Proposition 8 in California by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They call for “respect” and “civility.”

Such protestations fall flat since the complainers exercised considerable muscle to use the California legislative process to oppress gay people. This battle is not simply political. It is an act of aggression against a minority that has been too long oppressed.

We are fighting to reverse hundreds of years of legal homophobia. The marriage victory in California was a sign of social progress. Fighting to take away marriage protections from our elderly and our children is an act of hatred deserving retribution.

The gay community and our allies must respond appropriately. If Mormons and other sowers of hate want civility from us, they must stop trampling upon our civil rights.

Marc Levine
Brooklyn, Nov. 15, 2008

Now for starters, let us consider that running a campaign and winning a vote is BY DEFINITION “civil” whilst riots, vandalism, forcing people out of jobs, and  threats of physical harm, are all, likewise BY DEFINITION NOT CIVIL!  If we accept for the sake of argument that this is a civil rights issue (which I DO NOT – how can something that we issue a license for be a right?)  these people forget the essential lesson of Martin Luther King’s non-violent civil disobedience campaign.  It was in the non-threatening, non-destructive nature of the King lead protests, and the violent ugly response of the governmental and non-governmental oppressors, that the nation learned the lesson of the wrong of segregation.  All we are learning from the activities of the so-called LGBT community after Prop 8 is that they are a bunch of self-involved, petulant, violent miscreants more obsessed with their own desire than the simple peace of the community.

But what remains most fascinating on all this is the singling out of the CJCLDS for the particular ire of the protests and disagreement.  As has been clear since the beginning, and is increasingly true as evangelical voices and a Jewish voice in an Anglican outlet, make plain we are all in this together.  Says Rabbi Shifren:

People have perhaps wondered: why the Mormons? Answer: they are a small, yet vocal Christian minority. They have been selected by the mobs as vulnerable, a group that might not have such massive support among America’s Christians.

Indeed!   There should be no doubt that what is truly at stake here is a fight for simple decency.  And when they are done with the Mormons, we will be next.

And, as things turn out, we apparently have to fight not only the radical LGBT community, but many inside Mormonism as well.

Just 10 months after the death of LDS President Gordon B. Hinckley, who spent nearly 70 years burnishing his church’s public image, goodwill toward Mormonism that culminated during the 2002 Winter Olympic Games seems to have faded in a haze of misunderstanding and outright hostility.

Mean-spirited critiques of Mormonism during Mitt Romney’s unsuccessful presidential campaign were followed by persistent news-media reports linking Latter-day Saints  to the FLDS polygamous sect raided by Texas authorities. Now, angry opponents of Proposition 8 are demonstrating at Mormon temples, accusing the church of being anti-gay.

This analysis seems precisely wrong.   Is there opposition to Mormonism?  Of course there is!  Just as there is opposition to Evangelicalism, Catholicism, Orthodox, and the rest  that claim morality and a supernatural authority to support it.  This is, in this Evangelical’s opinion, indeed a “Mormon moment.”  They have gained so much.

In the Romney candidacy, even though a losing effort, the bigotry that does reside, sadly, inside Evangelicalism has been revealed.   And as he who fronted for that bigotry continues to misstep, we see that minority of Evangelicals increasingly marginalized.  The FLDS has served to illustrate the difference between that, dare I say – CULT, and the mainstream of Mormonism.  And Prop 8 has and is building political unity between Mormons, Catholics, Jews and Evangelicals.

Now is no time for Mormons, or any other engaged believer, to withdraw into their shell.  Much work remains to be done, and we are here presented with a golden opportunity to do it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • PDF
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Twitter
Sphere: Related Content

Posted in Proposition 8 | 2 Comments » | Print this post Print this post | Email This Post Email This Post

Recently Posted:

2 Responses to “In The Wake Of Prop 8”

  1. TVHall on 22 Nov 2008 at 1:39 pm #

    It’s my understanding that the Salt Lake Tribune is the “opposition” newspaper, so their stance on this isn’t surprising. The quote by JaLynn Prince is interesting in its contradictory nature. Clearly she has taken a side in this.

    The notion that Mormons underestimated the opposition is also amusing. If this were true, the result would have gone the other way. In reality, it was the opposition that misjudged the effectiveness of their rhetoric.

    However, the first line of the final paragraph is a nearly perfect description of the nature of this debate. And the continued success of those in favor of traditional marriage is incumbent on their understanding of this point.

    To whatever extent the pro-traditional marriage position is based in religious belief, the most – and in the end perhaps the only – effective method for turning aside this threat is to expose the erroneous nature of the civil rights argument.

    Two effective arguments have been formulated during the Proposition 8 campaign, one based on the definition of what is a right, and the other based on the millennia-old definition of marriage. As the anti-marriage forces have shown, these points need to be refined and repeated, continually, for them to take hold in the psyche of society.

  2. Greg on 03 Dec 2008 at 12:10 am #

    Hi John,

    Thank you for an incisive commentary. I couldn’t agree more with your comments. People of all religious beliefs will suffer if Prop 8 is overturned. And not just because of this one issue, but due to the so-called unintended consequences of the precedence this will set in an apparent attempt to create “social justice.”

    One reason members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints voiced concern over this issue is due to our belief in the Book of Mormon. This record gives an account of two ancient civilizations that were destroyed due to a group of politically-minded individuals intent on the overthrow of society and established government.

    As members of the Church, we have been warned for many years about the existence of such groups in our own society. It seems apparent these groups are active – if only behind the scenes. For example, see Proposition 8, Mormons, and the New Statesman and Hegelian Dialectic.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

« A Catholic Defense of Mormon Support (and other religions’ support) for Prop 8  |  Say What?! »