No Break - A Big Mistake In The Wake, Dobson Style
We wrote yesterday of working hard not to let the MSM write “the simple narrative” to the Romney campaign, and particularly the religion angle. And yet the SLTrib started to paint it in entirely religious terms almost immediately, which Lowell addressed well last night. And other events are breaking that do not help much.
Conspiracy theories are born of events, often unrelated, but which can be strung together to create a picture of sinister intent. In light of the desire of people to paint a simple narrative on this whole thing, I think James Dobson has fed a conspiracy theory for years to come with his endorsement last night of Huckabee. I think this may haunt Evangelicals:
In a statement first obtained by The Associated Press, Dobson revisited his declaration on Super Tuesday that he could not in good conscience vote for John McCain, the front-runner, because of concerns over the Arizona senator’s conservative credentials.
Dobson said given the situation at that point, he was reluctant to choose between “two pro-family candidates whom I could support” - Huckabee and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.
But Dobson wrote that Romney’s announcement Thursday that he was suspending his campaign “changed the political landscape.”
Now, I believe Dobson here. I do not know the man personally, but I know people that do, and I do not think he is capable of the deception or misdirection that would be necessary to pull off the obvious conspiracy theory that will flow out of this. My interpretation of this is that James Dobson is extremely firm in his commitment to social conservatives issues, that he backs those issues at the expense of virtually anything else, and that he is politically naive.
But my convictions on this notwithstanding, the appearance, which will be used by many to establish a narrative, is just awful.
Let’s start here, with this piece in the American Thinker:
The US has always had far too many varieties of faith and non-faith for any religion to gain a majority. That is why Huckabee’s faith-baiting didn’t play in most of the country, and it is also why his support will not expand far beyond the Bible Belt.
The “faith-baiting” refers to Huckabee’s anti-Mormon “aside” to the NYTimes just before Iowa. There is a lot of truth to that quote. Which means that by endorsing Huck, Dobson has pretty much squandered his endorsement. His conscience may have demanded same, but given that his lack of support for McCain was already well known from his Monday statement, not to mention his very early statements and their context, would not an endorsement of Huckabee been implicit after Romney’s withdrawal? And would have allowing it to stay implicit not have avoided the appearance of a conspiracy?
The possible theory is simple. Dobson’s Monday anti-McCain declaration could be read, and certainly was read by some out of their own anti-Mormon bias, as an encouragement to vote for Huck. It will be interesting to see - I hope someone polls this - how much of an effect Dobson’s Monday declaration had in Huck’s Super Tuesday southern sweep. To come out with this Huck endorsement mere hours after Romney’s withdrawal makes it all appear very strategic. You just know someone is going to try and connect the dots, and with the MSM poised on the religion question, and wanting to simplify things, they may be active participants is such conspiratorial theorizing.
When you also examine the actions of the Dobson-allied FRC, releasing key staffers to the Huckabee campaign just long enough to help with Iowa and rob Romney of momentum, one can construct a very plausible “Stop the Mormon” scenario.
With Mormon disappointment and anger at the levels it is right now, I am surprised the charge has not already been leveled. With so many creedal Christians out there floating outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the Mormons; it is a testament to Mormon patience and forbearing that they have not struck back in a similar fashion.
None Of This Helps Any Of Us…
Now, here is the bottom line. We are fighting liberal, secularist tendencies in the nation. Something Evangelicals, creedal Christians in general and Mormons share in common. Given that common cause, it makes no sense whatsoever to divide the forces - particularly when Romney is out. What possible political good can come from deepening the divide in an already divided political camp? The Mormon vote is significant and important to social conservative causes (see the American Thinker quote above) - driving an additional nail in an already sealed coffin can only serve as a big enormous, “Get out of my face and leave me alone.” And thus we Evangelicals lose potentially 6 million allied Mormon votes; votes we desperately need - particularly in a McCain lead party.
The chief charge of the left against us, as religious voters, is that we are small-minded, irrational, and easily led. These moves add to that appearance, supplying ammunition to our genuine political foe. It makes us appear more interested in our petty inter-religious squabbles than fighting for the things that matter and can be affected on the national stage. Likely innocence of intent notwithstanding, it also makes us appear devious and untrustworthy.
The social conservative wing of the Republican party is hurting right now, and this move opens the wound wider. BIG MISTAKE.
Saturday Morning Addition: The WSJ looks at Dobson’s move in almost purely political terms and makes some pretty stark statements:
But for the network of socially conservative activists who are now such a large part of the Republican Party, this is also an instructive moment. They have to decide if they care more about achieving their policy goals than they do about being kingmakers within the GOP.
They then go on to make a very convincing case that McCain is the best bet at this point for pro-life concerns. I’d like to rephrase this pullquote just a bit - What Evangelicals need to learn at this juncture is that it is more important to do politics well, advancing you particular concerns, NOT play identity games. The WSJ argument is in many ways, the same one I made on Monday, save adjusting the math to compensate for Romney’s withdrawal. *Sigh*
Sphere: Related Content
Posted in Candidate Qualifications, Doctrinal Obedience, Electability, News Media Bias, Political Strategy, Understanding Religion | 13 Comments » |
Print this post
|
Email This Post
Recently:
- Legality, Religiousity, Post-Prop 8 Ugliness and the Case Against Huckabee
- Prop 8 and religion: A moral or political issue, or both?
- RED MEAT! Hewitt, Huckabee and Anti-Mormonism
- Say What?!
- In The Wake Of Prop 8
- A Catholic Defense of Mormon Support (and other religions’ support) for Prop 8
- Being The Target
- Encouraging?
- Proposition 8: Multi-Faith Press Conference Speaks Out Against Attacks
- And Now…Terrorism!?
13 Responses to “No Break - A Big Mistake In The Wake, Dobson Style”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







CarlH on 08 Feb 2008 at 8:39 am #
Huckabee’s faith-baiting went well beyond the famous aside to the New York Times reporter. He never disavowed those working actively on his behalf, such as Pastor Sherwood Haisty, Jr., of pastors4huckabee.com (which is still linked on the blog roll at Huckabee’s official campaign website, who much more actively and explicitly attacked Romney on the basis of religion, whose most recent attack you noted here on A6Blog just Wednesday. Are LDS voters overly sensitive and focused in on all possible slilghts? Perhaps. But without a disavowal, their anger toward Huckabee personally is certainly understandable.
Tracy in GA on 08 Feb 2008 at 9:34 am #
O.K. I realize I have beam in my own eye, and I will eventually have to remove it. But right now, I feel extreme animosity for my “Christian” neighbors. I am a Mormon who lives in the Bible Belt of the south and I have always been keenly aware of what Evangelicals think of me. I have been prayed for in prayer groups on the one hand and shunned on the other. I have to tell you what is really fueling this. On Sunday Feb. 3rd while Romney was attending a Sacrament meeting, sitting in the back quietly with an aide, Mike Huckabee was preaching both sermons at Woodstock Baptist Church here in Woodstock, GA. So, you say? This is not that uncommon for presidental hopefuls to speak in churches. However, this paticular church is led by an “ex-Mormon” and they hold regular sunday school classes which explain why The Church of Jesus Christ of LDS is a cult, as well as a few others. This church has an average attendance of 15,000 per sabbath. This is all common knowledge in my community. Add to that, some of the comments I heard while making calls for the Romney campaign, and I believe the narrative the MSM is promoting because it is TRUE!!!! I have always gladly and enthusiastically supported evangelicals in their political pursuits. I have thorougly studied Romney’s positions and came to support him carefully. The last thing any Mormon wants is someone in the public light who reflects badly on our faith
( THINK HARRY REID). More importantly he lines up politically with where I stand, not perfectly, but very well. I was interviewed after a Romney rally here in Atlanta on Monday. I said, “He is the one candidate who will fight for the house that Reagan built.” So, today I am mad, very, very mad , to put it midly. I don’t swear, but I am swearing in my head which is just as bas according to scripture. I could potenially support McCain if he sufficently convinces me of his conservative “conversion” but I will not under any circumstances support Mike Huckabee the Southern Baptist or any ticket with his name on it!!! That is of course, until I repent and figure out how to deal with the mess we are in.
Dissapointed,
Tracy Vickery
4thnephite on 08 Feb 2008 at 9:40 am #
The only person I put my trust in has just suspended his way forward. I have never doubted what the other side will do, and that includes the rest of the scoundrels. I guess I’m old enough to understand there might be a person on the grassy knoll. People have been damaged by many different theories. Let’s not get caught up in their smoke and mirrors.
We will survive.
David H. Sundwall on 08 Feb 2008 at 9:45 am #
The way I look at is that it must sting Huckabee that he couldn’t get Dobson’s endorsement until the Mormon left the stage. That should hurt a bit.
I tend to believe as one of Time’s blogs suggested that the the Focus on Family voter bulletin did favor Romney. But unfortunately, Dobson couldn’t bring himself to openly endorse Romney.
Ultimately, I think it’s a step in the right direction.
In Salt Lake the LDS-owned radio station plays Focus on the Family and I always wished that Dobson’s Focus would better recgonize and work with the LDS Church and its members b/c their goals are so very similar.
Perhaps, the internal politics of his organization and co-believers prevent that, but I’d like to believe Dobson does the best he can.
And just as Romney’s exit makes Huckabee’s campaign irrelevant on the national level, it makes him look silly that he couldn’t get Dobson’s nod until it was already all over.
JLFuller on 08 Feb 2008 at 10:28 am #
John, bless your heart, I see where you are going. But I don’t see some vast Evangelical conspiracy to disenfranchise Mormons. I am disappointed that more Evangelicals have not taken the time to get to know us better. I am disappointed that they voted in large blocks for the Evangelical without giving equal consideration to Romney, but I don’t think it rises to the level of conspiracy. In this case it was limited to about 25% of the values voters. Before the elections, I would have thought the anti-Mormon vote would have been much higher. But only 25%? In some circles, I’ll bet some Mormons are almost giddy.
JLFuller on 08 Feb 2008 at 11:08 am #
I would like to address Tracy’s post if I may. Surely living in the deep south has its own problems for those considered outsiders. It may be an uncomfortable feeling for many converts who were once members of the “in” crowd. But I believe in the inherent goodness of people. People who are sincere in their desire to know God and live a Godly life find these hate mongers tiresome at least and maybe even dangerous to their souls. They appeal to people’s fear and intend to generate hate. These are not good people. They are hateful people. I spent my adult life working with hate-filled angry people who blame others. It destroys them. It eats at whatever goodness lies dormant in them. Some put on a good show of it, but when you get right down to the real human being you discover an ugliness that is repelant.
Big buildings, TV programs and thousands of people filling the seats means nothing. Roman circuses attracted thousands too and you wouldn’t consider them holy. What you are seeing in such places is an abomination. They teach a form of godliness but their hearts are far away. Some teach hatred and intolerance and attract those of a similar mind set. That is what genuinely righteous people discover. Then they become uncomfortable and start looking around for something more. They find something is missing but they just don”t know what it is and they start looking elsewhere.
I don’t know the church you talk about but I recognize the symptoms. Just remember you knew what you were getting into before you came to this earth and you came anyway. You knew the benefits far out weighed the pain. Feel the anger but then put it away. Drop the ill will and choose to be happy knowing who you really are and why you are here. This is such an interesting time to be on the earth. You have so many blessings that others do not have. Remember your Father in heaven loves you and is aware of what happens. And most importantly, He is always available when you need Him and you don’t need any human being to make the connection for you.
Rusty on 08 Feb 2008 at 11:28 am #
John,
You cant take the Salt Lake Tribune too seriously. They are in the heart of Mormon-ville and those of us who live here know that everything they write has some kind of religious angle to it; usually slanted against the Mormons. We are used to it That said, it won’t prevent other MSM parrots from picking up their story and squawking it to the heavens.
In Salt Lake the (non-member/member,us/them) mentality is pretty strong yet Romney had major support all around. I personally think this had more to do with Romney spending two years of his time in Utah running the 2002 Olympics. The numbers througout his campaign showed that the more Romney could take his message to the people, the more support he got. That tends to support another commenter’s opinion that anti-mormon sentiment is strongest where people don’t know a lot of Mormons. Where people didn’t get to meet and know Romney, the predjudice (whether religious, the overly distorted flip-flopper label, or both) was strongest and lasted.
This has been a great election cycle, even if most of it was only observed by political junkies like myself. We had a wide open field that has been narrowed through a never before seen primary process. The national general election camapaign will be intense and electric. Hopefully, the religious debate truly has pulled more people out of their comfort zones and caused them to look around them and get involved. Not just in poltics, but in neighborhood outreach, defending their faith (evangelical and mormon), and helping to change the world. This election cycle has given us a very interesting view of where our country stands. I think the path of action for conservatives is clear, we need to regroup and come back stronger and more unified than ever. Hopefully, in time for the House/Senate/Presidential elections in November. There is more to change in Washington than just our Executive.
(That last bit was probably too political for Article VI but I’m sure religion will play some part in those State elections as well.)
HaroldHutchison on 08 Feb 2008 at 12:41 pm #
Let’s look at the facts:
* Dr. Dobson’s wife tried to exclude Mormons from the national day of prayer in 2004, never mind that that year, Mitt Romney had been fighting hard against the judicial imposition of gay marriage in Massachusetts.
* Dr. Dobson is telling people to vote against McCain priorto Super Tuesday. Yet after Mitt Romney suspends his campaign, he is willing to make an endorsement.
See my post at Called as Seen on this one.
I think I will get out and vote for McCain… just to spite Dr. Dobson.
lizzie on 08 Feb 2008 at 3:03 pm #
JLFuller,
I have to respectfully disagree. I live in Colorado and have a small service oriented business for women. When the Bible-study-group type of Evangelical woman finds out I’m a Mormon, they are shocked, because “they hear scary things about Mormons.”
They refuse to then discuss anything religious with me. Come on, there is a huge movement among Evangelical churches to paint Mormons with a very negative brush. And this is in Colorado, not even the south.
In fact, I often wonder if this was the “reason” for Mitt’s run. It obviously wasn’t for him to rescue the country from bad government, perhaps it was to cause some heat again.
coltakashi on 08 Feb 2008 at 4:04 pm #
The Salt Lake Tribune article quotes a reporter for ABC and non-Mormon political scientists for the conclusion that anti-Mormonism created just enough friction on the Romney campaign to prevent him from winning the support that he would have received had he been a Methodist.
What makes the analysis credible is the fact that there are active programs in the Southern Baptist Convention and other Evangelical churches to teach their members that Mormons are “not legitimate”, the very doctrine that even moderate Evangelical leaders feared would be threatened by election of a Mormon to the presidency. Those churches and their ministers have, to a large extent, invested their financial resources and their credibility in a decades-long effort to slow down the Mormon juggernaut of conversion that takes some 30,000 to 40,000 people out of the Evangelical orbit each year and turns them into Mormons. Those efforts went on uninterrupted during the course of the primary campaigns, and made specific reference to Romney as a Mormon. Reverend Huckabee only had to do the subtlest of reminders to voters to remind them of their indoctrination in the belief that Mormons follow a bad religion, which reinforces the corollary that they must do so because they are ignorant and unintelligent, or actively seek what is bad. The next deduction in the chain is that any Mormon who appears to be intelligent and good is a deceiver. To credit Romney as both intelligent and good, in other words “legitimate”, would call into question the axiomatic foundation of the anti-Mormon teachings that are sponsored by so many congregations. Those who have been indoctrinated with the belief that Mormonism is a pagan cult since childhood Sunday School are a primed bomb of bias that only needs a small spark to be set off.
The saddest part of this story is that it has ministers of the gospel actively encouraging prejudice toward other people, shunning them and viewing them as irremediably evil or stupid. The reasoning the ministers give is that Mormonism leads people away from salvation, so it cannot be tolerated. Of course, strictly speaking, the same could be said about Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, or brands of Christianity that do not accept the Evangelical viewpoint. That kind of thinking, that anyone in “false” religions cannot be allowed full legitimacy in society, is the establishment of a religion as favored by the state, expressly barred by the First Amendment. The ministers of this “gospel” reject the teaching of the parable of the Good Samaritan, that a heretic who nevertheless loves his neighbor, regardless of religion, is better in the eyes of God than a theologically correct man who disobeys God’s second great commandment when it comes to such heretics. After all, Jesus himself said that the leaders of the Jews called him a “Samaritan”.
Latter-day Saints are expressly committed to giving full legitimacy to every other religion within a nation. It is one of the 13 Articles of Faith, a mutual religious tolerance. The fact of relgious differences is not allowed to be an excuse for using social or government power to restrict the rights and freedoms of other churches or their members. Mormons have voted for people not of faith for public office since the begginnings of their church in the US. One of the first Senators from Utah after statehood was a Catholic, Thomas Kearns, and one of the first governors was Simon Bamberger, a Jew. Anyone who has lived in Utah knows of examples where the LDS Church as an institution or local congregations have made special efforts to aid other churches, even to helping them build churches or rehabilitate them, as well as loaning buildings for special programs or when other churches had been destroyed by fire. Mormons give aid after disasters without regard to religion. How many Evangelical congregations have gone out of their way to aid a small Mormon congregation in the South, rather than picket and protest the construction of Mormon churches and temples?
MItt Romney has no special right or claim to be elected president because he is a Mormon. On the other hand, he does have a right as an American to be treated like any other law-abiding American, and not be shunned off the stage of public debate because of his religion.
One thing the numbers in the primaries make clear is that, despite the anti-Mormon indoctrination, a lot of Evangelicals were willing to support Romney in his campaign, as demonstrated by the endorsments given by some Evangelical leaders. They were usually explicit in drawing a distinction between endorsing Romney for the office and endorsing his church as legitimate. That was fine with Romney, as he made clear in The Speech. Unfortunately, that distinction proved too subtle for some people. Mike Huckabee’s statements on religious tolerance for Romney came across as grudging. He did not make any ringing endorsement of religious freedom for all, including for election to the presidency. He could not in fact do so without undercutting his chief argument for support, namely that by voting for him they would be advancing the specific cause of their view of religion over all others. He could hardly say “Mormons should be treated by every Christian as fully entitled to the same opportunities, including election to the presidency, as any Christian,” because he was saying from the outset that he was a superior candidate because of his dedication to that religion. Saying Romney is not a good choice for president because of his not being a “Christian” and saying that he should be excluded from election because of being a Mormon sound like the same thing to most voters. Claiming ignorance about Mormonism was clearly his way of avoiding confronting the intersection of his argument and the base of anti-Mormon prejudice among some Evangelicals. By feigning ignorance, Reverend Huckabee avoided giving any legitimacy to Romney’s religion, basically telling his supporters that Romney’s religion is a big question mark and they should have questions, and thus suspicion, about him.
JLFuller on 08 Feb 2008 at 5:34 pm #
Lizzie
Your experience is what others experience every day too. These are people who just don’t know better. They have been fed so many half truths, lies and distortions their attitude it is quite understandable. Consider that most of our converts come from some other Christian denomination and joined after they heard the Gospel from authorized representatives.
When I talked about disenfranchisement I meant politically. According to CNN, in states where they gather such information, exit/entrance polls indicated Born Again and Evangelicals voted for Romney, or within 2% of Huckabee, in California, Arizona, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida and Michigan. They had a chance to overwhelmingly vote anti-Mormon but did not. Of course the southern states are a different story. In other states there was a much smaller vote but it was not negligible. Maybe someone has better numbers, but I think these are enough to make my point. Compared to a few decades ago, this is a big improvement.
Brent Welker on 08 Feb 2008 at 5:55 pm #
The following article from the Deseret News shows the deep disillusion, pain and resentment felt by many Latter-day Saints: http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695251420,00.html. The comments are particularly illuminating. Doctor Dobson’s late endorsement of Mike Huckabee merely added fuel to the fire.
jane on 08 Feb 2008 at 5:57 pm #
I think we need to remember the reason that the Romney family themselves gave for their run. If I remember right it went something like this–That they felt that they maybe had been blessed to be in the right place, time, with right training and $ to try to help America get on track.
I am LDS too, and have had prejudiced members of other faiths treat me not as they would like to be treated, I’m sure.
Still, maybe this run is like Zions camp, where they marched all that way,and then left without feeling they had done anything to help the people get their rights and property back.
Yet, as we look back on it, we can see that it was in the STRUGGLE of that march, that people came to know themselves and others to know them. If I remember right most if not all of the 12 were chosen from that group.
I think Mitts run, has helped us to know him and our selves better and others to maybe know Mormons better. Maybe some will look at themselves and others like them and think they wished they had acted differently. Maybe NEXT election, though things in the world seem to be getting worse faster and faster, and maybe the Savior will return by that time!!
I put up a sign in our tiny town which said, “If you don’t support what you want, you may get what you don’t!”
There may be a lot of people who are sorry that they didn’t get out there sooner to show support for Mitts run. I notice that Hannity and others were asked about that even.
I was interested that in what I read, I have NOT seen that Romney is personally supporting McCain or Huckabee, but only said he would get out of the way. I’m glad for that, as I myself have had a hard time, but if that is the BEST we can come up with, I may “have to hold my nose and vote for him” has his mother said.
I have also wondered if “suspended” might mean that if something should happen, he MIGHT be willing to still be our President?? He didn’t say quit, or he didn’t think he would be the best, etc. ?
Well, I’m thankful that I believe that God is over all, and that as we have been praying that the best possible happen in this run, that I have to think it has, that somehow this will turn to the Romney family’s and all our goods, as we all do love the Lord Jesus Christ.
Also, I wondered if it might help some who have demonised (sp?) Mitt and all Mormons, to see him so graciously suspend, and now that they don’t have a target in him, maybe they will take a second look at what is left? Maybe they will realize they didn’t have so much to fear? Gods’ will be done on earth! Jane