<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It All Identity Politics Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/</link>
	<description>&#34;Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by an Evangelical Christian and A Mormon&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:05:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CarlH</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12094</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/#comment-12094</guid>
		<description>Better link (?) to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IMAGES/cartoons/toon012308.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Ramirez cartoon&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better link (?) to <a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IMAGES/cartoons/toon012308.gif" rel="nofollow">the Ramirez cartoon</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlH</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12093</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/#comment-12093</guid>
		<description>Not exactly sure what Michael Ramirez is trying say about Republicans by this &lt;a href=&quot;//www.ibdeditorials.com/cartoons.aspxp://&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cartoon for tomorrow&#039;s Investors&#039; Business Daily&lt;/a&gt;, but it is certainly germane to The Question . . .  and the issue of identity politics generally.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly sure what Michael Ramirez is trying say about Republicans by this <a href="//www.ibdeditorials.com/cartoons.aspxp://" rel="nofollow">cartoon for tomorrow&#8217;s Investors&#8217; Business Daily</a>, but it is certainly germane to The Question . . .  and the issue of identity politics generally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLFuller</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12092</link>
		<dc:creator>JLFuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/#comment-12092</guid>
		<description>I would like to address Madison&#039;s concern as posted above. The general Evangelical membership is not the problem. I have been as tough on Evangelical leadership as anyone, but my issue has never been about theology. It has always been about the &lt;em&gt;behavior&lt;/em&gt; of those who claim to represent Evangelicals who oppose Mitt Romney&#039;s candidacy on theological grounds and their attendant distortions about Mormon doctrine and practice.

There have been many fine, and I believe Christ-like, people who have disassociated themselves from Evangelical leaders who mix religion and politics. But as far as the general membership goes, I have no more idea what the average Evangelical thinks than they do about what I think. I thought I knew but have been proven wrong often enough to change my mind. But I do know how many of them have voted and why, at least according to the entrance and exit polls. It is those people who I believe have erred and it those who claim to be leaders and speak for Evangelicals who have left the bitter taste in my mouth. Their behavior is fair game. 

Madison also brought up Catholics. Religious intolerance has been a hallmark of Christianity for 2000 years. But things are changing. When we drop the &lt;em&gt;&quot;you are going to hell because you don&#039;t believe like I do&quot; &lt;/em&gt;nonsense then walls come down and relationships are repaired.  Religious differences will always exist but they should not divide us. We are better than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to address Madison&#8217;s concern as posted above. The general Evangelical membership is not the problem. I have been as tough on Evangelical leadership as anyone, but my issue has never been about theology. It has always been about the <em>behavior</em> of those who claim to represent Evangelicals who oppose Mitt Romney&#8217;s candidacy on theological grounds and their attendant distortions about Mormon doctrine and practice.</p>
<p>There have been many fine, and I believe Christ-like, people who have disassociated themselves from Evangelical leaders who mix religion and politics. But as far as the general membership goes, I have no more idea what the average Evangelical thinks than they do about what I think. I thought I knew but have been proven wrong often enough to change my mind. But I do know how many of them have voted and why, at least according to the entrance and exit polls. It is those people who I believe have erred and it those who claim to be leaders and speak for Evangelicals who have left the bitter taste in my mouth. Their behavior is fair game. </p>
<p>Madison also brought up Catholics. Religious intolerance has been a hallmark of Christianity for 2000 years. But things are changing. When we drop the <em>&#8220;you are going to hell because you don&#8217;t believe like I do&#8221; </em>nonsense then walls come down and relationships are repaired.  Religious differences will always exist but they should not divide us. We are better than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLFuller</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12090</link>
		<dc:creator>JLFuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/#comment-12090</guid>
		<description>I understand Doug Wead is a big time historian, but his News Max piece is a bit off the mark when he said


&lt;blockquote&gt;And it sends a very clear message to both the Romney and Huckabee camps. There is no way either one will win in a general election without having the other one on the ticket.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If the Republican party has to rely on Mike Huckbee&#039;s mug on the ticket then we will loose. The American voter will not countenance a bigoted candidate.  Every goof ball comment he has made, his religious denominations active hate campaigns and poor showings in non-Evangelical states makes Huckabee the poorest choice for a VP on a Republican ticket. The Republican party&#039;s best chance is to distance itself from this guy. Just remember only about 25% of the population defines itself as Evangelical. 

Other presidential candidates have been somewhat less identified with Evangelicals, GWB excepted. But Huckabee has the highest Evangelical profile since WWII. Is there anyone out there who thinks the Dems won&#039;t drag that up? Every left wing darling group who can claim to be a victim of Evangelical demonizing would have an opportunity to tell the world about it while shaking his trembling victim finger at the Republicans. It is going to be tough enough for Romney or McCain to win given the dismal performance of the recent Republican Congress without putting a millstone around his neck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Doug Wead is a big time historian, but his News Max piece is a bit off the mark when he said</p>
<blockquote><p>And it sends a very clear message to both the Romney and Huckabee camps. There is no way either one will win in a general election without having the other one on the ticket.</p></blockquote>
<p>If the Republican party has to rely on Mike Huckbee&#8217;s mug on the ticket then we will loose. The American voter will not countenance a bigoted candidate.  Every goof ball comment he has made, his religious denominations active hate campaigns and poor showings in non-Evangelical states makes Huckabee the poorest choice for a VP on a Republican ticket. The Republican party&#8217;s best chance is to distance itself from this guy. Just remember only about 25% of the population defines itself as Evangelical. </p>
<p>Other presidential candidates have been somewhat less identified with Evangelicals, GWB excepted. But Huckabee has the highest Evangelical profile since WWII. Is there anyone out there who thinks the Dems won&#8217;t drag that up? Every left wing darling group who can claim to be a victim of Evangelical demonizing would have an opportunity to tell the world about it while shaking his trembling victim finger at the Republicans. It is going to be tough enough for Romney or McCain to win given the dismal performance of the recent Republican Congress without putting a millstone around his neck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madison</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/comment-page-1/#comment-12089</link>
		<dc:creator>madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2008/01/22/is-it-all-identity-politics-now/#comment-12089</guid>
		<description>Oooh wow. You just compared evangelicals to Al Qaeda. I am now officially uncoditionally opposed to Mitt Romney, who is now FINALLY running the campaign that he should have in the beginning too little too late, just to spite people like you. You guys are just as hateful against evangelicals as you accuse evangelicals are of being against Mormons. Quite simply, you people are hateful, loathsome, evil human beings. Good bye, good night, and good luck. I know that you are not going to approve this comment because you usually don&#039;t, and you can go ahead and shut down my account because there is no reason to come back here anymore. 

The best part of this election is that evangelicals are now seeing what the GOP, especially Roman Catholics, really think of them and how little regard they actually have for issues that evangelicals care about. Hopefully evangelicals are reading stuff like this and will take David Kuo&#039;s advice to drop out of politics. Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, or Hillary Clinton are all quite frankly better than you wicked liars deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh wow. You just compared evangelicals to Al Qaeda. I am now officially uncoditionally opposed to Mitt Romney, who is now FINALLY running the campaign that he should have in the beginning too little too late, just to spite people like you. You guys are just as hateful against evangelicals as you accuse evangelicals are of being against Mormons. Quite simply, you people are hateful, loathsome, evil human beings. Good bye, good night, and good luck. I know that you are not going to approve this comment because you usually don&#8217;t, and you can go ahead and shut down my account because there is no reason to come back here anymore. </p>
<p>The best part of this election is that evangelicals are now seeing what the GOP, especially Roman Catholics, really think of them and how little regard they actually have for issues that evangelicals care about. Hopefully evangelicals are reading stuff like this and will take David Kuo&#8217;s advice to drop out of politics. Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, or Hillary Clinton are all quite frankly better than you wicked liars deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
