<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Reading List &#8211; November 19, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.article6blog.com/2007/11/19/todays-reading-list-november-19-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2007/11/19/todays-reading-list-november-19-2007/</link>
	<description>&#34;Religion, Politics, the Presidency: Commentary by a Mormon, an Evangelical, and an Orthodox Christian&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:15:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coltakashi</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2007/11/19/todays-reading-list-november-19-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7999</link>
		<dc:creator>coltakashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.article6blog.com/2007/11/19/todays-reading-list-november-19-2007/#comment-7999</guid>
		<description>The wing nuts of the left and right both state as a given that Mormons are both devious and stupid.  Yet they offer no evidence to support that conclusion.  Their claim that Romney is an example of the devious/stupid Mormons is where their argument breaks down.  

Romney is both intelligent and clearly honest.  (If he were dishonest, we would have heard from someone by now.)  Therefore, the argument of the wingnuts that he is a Mormon, and therefore, deceptive and stupid, is disproved.  Therefore, basic logic requires the conclusion that the assumptions that led to this false conclusion are plainly false.  If the wingnuts can&#039;t admit that their assertions about Mormons are not false, then they themselves are stupid or devious.  QED.  I suggest my conclusion is based on solid facts and real logic, whereas their arguments have neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wing nuts of the left and right both state as a given that Mormons are both devious and stupid.  Yet they offer no evidence to support that conclusion.  Their claim that Romney is an example of the devious/stupid Mormons is where their argument breaks down.  </p>
<p>Romney is both intelligent and clearly honest.  (If he were dishonest, we would have heard from someone by now.)  Therefore, the argument of the wingnuts that he is a Mormon, and therefore, deceptive and stupid, is disproved.  Therefore, basic logic requires the conclusion that the assumptions that led to this false conclusion are plainly false.  If the wingnuts can&#8217;t admit that their assertions about Mormons are not false, then they themselves are stupid or devious.  QED.  I suggest my conclusion is based on solid facts and real logic, whereas their arguments have neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

