<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s Reading List - July 10, 2007</title>
	<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2007/07/10/todays-reading-list-july-10-2007/</link>
	<description>Religion in the 2008 Presidential Campaign: Commentary by an Evangelical Christian and a Mormon</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CarlH</title>
		<link>http://www.article6blog.com/2007/07/10/todays-reading-list-july-10-2007/#comment-6554</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.article6blog.com/2007/07/10/todays-reading-list-july-10-2007/#comment-6554</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/hillary_on_her_faith_1.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cal Thomas&lt;/a&gt; weighs in on the questions of Hillary's faith, with an argument that sounds eerily similar to some attacks on Romney's faith including a discussion of whether she is faithful to "classic Christian theology."  He starts off acknowledging that the depth of one's faith is personal and beyond the judgment of others, but then suggests a candidate's profession of faith (and its orthodoxy) is subject to scrutiny if used "as an election tactic."  If politics is to be about issues and not cults of personality, there really is no room this--regardless of which part of the political spectrum it may come from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/hillary_on_her_faith_1.html" rel="nofollow">Cal Thomas</a> weighs in on the questions of Hillary&#8217;s faith, with an argument that sounds eerily similar to some attacks on Romney&#8217;s faith including a discussion of whether she is faithful to &#8220;classic Christian theology.&#8221;  He starts off acknowledging that the depth of one&#8217;s faith is personal and beyond the judgment of others, but then suggests a candidate&#8217;s profession of faith (and its orthodoxy) is subject to scrutiny if used &#8220;as an election tactic.&#8221;  If politics is to be about issues and not cults of personality, there really is no room this&#8211;regardless of which part of the political spectrum it may come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
